Comments on: Health Care IT: What’s Good for Consumers? What’s Government’s Role? http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/02/health-care-it-whats-good-for-consumers-whats-governments-role/ Survival Strategies Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:48:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Health Care Reform: Where can both sides agree? | THE BIPARTREPORT http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/02/health-care-it-whats-good-for-consumers-whats-governments-role/comment-page-1/#comment-65 Health Care Reform: Where can both sides agree? | THE BIPARTREPORT Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:14:42 +0000 http://ushealthcrisis.com/?p=125#comment-65 [...] that if this is not done properly, it will cost American taxpayers far more than it will save. Congress, take heed. This cannot be ignored or made into a political [...] [...] that if this is not done properly, it will cost American taxpayers far more than it will save. Congress, take heed. This cannot be ignored or made into a political [...]

]]> By: Health Care Reform: Where can we agree? — US Health Crisis http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/02/health-care-it-whats-good-for-consumers-whats-governments-role/comment-page-1/#comment-61 Health Care Reform: Where can we agree? — US Health Crisis Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:57:19 +0000 http://ushealthcrisis.com/?p=125#comment-61 [...] that if this is not done properly, it will cost American taxpayers far more than it will save. Congress, take heed. This cannot be ignored or made into a political [...] [...] that if this is not done properly, it will cost American taxpayers far more than it will save. Congress, take heed. This cannot be ignored or made into a political [...]

]]> By: WebPixie http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/02/health-care-it-whats-good-for-consumers-whats-governments-role/comment-page-1/#comment-657 WebPixie Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:05:02 +0000 http://ushealthcrisis.com/?p=125#comment-657 It strikes me that the PATIENT should have PRIMARY CONTROL over the information that's available to a physician or any other provider, for that matter.<br><br>It could be that this is something more applicable to women's health than men's typical health issues. Doctors are just as human as the rest of us and we all come with our own prejudices about things outside our personal experience. Some women's health issues are easily misinterpreted by others, no matter what their profession or specialty. Simple PMS isn't recognized by some health care providers. Enough said.<br> <br>Bottom line, regardless of gender, it's the PHYSICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO be able to BUILD THE TRUST of any patient in order to allow unrestricted permission to that patient's health records (imho). It strikes me that the PATIENT should have PRIMARY CONTROL over the information that's available to a physician or any other provider, for that matter.

It could be that this is something more applicable to women's health than men's typical health issues. Doctors are just as human as the rest of us and we all come with our own prejudices about things outside our personal experience. Some women's health issues are easily misinterpreted by others, no matter what their profession or specialty. Simple PMS isn't recognized by some health care providers. Enough said.

Bottom line, regardless of gender, it's the PHYSICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO be able to BUILD THE TRUST of any patient in order to allow unrestricted permission to that patient's health records (imho).

]]> By: WebPixie http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/02/health-care-it-whats-good-for-consumers-whats-governments-role/comment-page-1/#comment-30 WebPixie Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:05:02 +0000 http://ushealthcrisis.com/?p=125#comment-30 It strikes me that the PATIENT should have PRIMARY CONTROL over the information that's available to a physician or any other provider, for that matter.<br><br>It could be that it's something more applicable to women's health than men's typical health issues. Doctors are just as human as the rest of us and we all come with our own prejudices about things outside our personal experience. Some women's health issues are easily misinterpreted by others, no matter what their profession or specialty. Simple PMS isn't recognized by some health care providers. Enough said.<br> <br>Bottom line, regardless of gender, it's the PHYSICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO be able to BUILD THE TRUST of any patient in order to allow unrestricted permission to that patient's health records (imho). It strikes me that the PATIENT should have PRIMARY CONTROL over the information that's available to a physician or any other provider, for that matter.

It could be that it's something more applicable to women's health than men's typical health issues. Doctors are just as human as the rest of us and we all come with our own prejudices about things outside our personal experience. Some women's health issues are easily misinterpreted by others, no matter what their profession or specialty. Simple PMS isn't recognized by some health care providers. Enough said.

Bottom line, regardless of gender, it's the PHYSICIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO be able to BUILD THE TRUST of any patient in order to allow unrestricted permission to that patient's health records (imho).

]]>