Reducing Healthcare Waste, The Easy Way – A Perspective

by Indy.GIll on December 1, 2009 · 2 comments

in Payers

While there is great debate over health care reform, one issue is clear—the nation is demanding more be done with less.  Minimizing unnecessary health care spend is a critical component of health care reform; better enabling us to provide quality health care services to more people for less money.

We all know the statistics: US health care costs are higher than all comparative advanced economies in the world. In 2006, the US spends 15.3% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care, compared with Switzerland’s 11.3%, the United Kingdom’s 8.4%, and Japan’s 8.1%.1 (Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, Trends in Health care costs and spending, March 2009).

Already 1/6th of our GDP, these costs are growing: if health care spending isHealth Care Spending as a % of GDPnot checked, it will continue to balloon.

It costs US employers substantially more to provide health care for employees, their families and retirees than it costs their foreign competition. General Motors, for example spent $5.2 Billion in 2004 on health care. This is significantly more than GM spent on steel, and accounted for $1,525 of the price of each new car it produced.

What’s worse is that many of these costs can be chalked up to waste. A recent report by Thompson Reuters estimates $700 Billion in inefficient health care spending:

  • Fraud & Abuse account for 19% of the waste – $125-$175 Billion
  • Provider inefficiencies and errors account for 12% of the waste – $75-$100 Billion
  • Administrative system inefficiencies account for 17% of the waste – $100-$150 Billion
  • Recovery Auditing, however, is an oft-overlooked answer to recouping some of the waste, particularly the 29% that can be chalked up to administrative system and provider inefficiencies. It is a low-risk, high ROI option that can be employed today.

    Post-payment recovery audits have been widely deployed in the retail industry, and have been successfully tested in the health care market. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) conducted a Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) demonstration program from 2005 to 2007
    Where the Waste Comes From
    During fiscal year 2007, the audits conducted in California, New York, and Florida identified and recovered over $357 Million despite being limited to a narrow audit scope (RAC contractors only audited a small percentage of total claims paid in those states).

    If recovery audits had been conducted on 100% of the claim volume, single year recoveries in the 3 states above could have yielded between $1.1 Billion to $2.4 Billion. The 3 states mentioned above represent 24.5% of the US Population.

    So, extending the post payment recovery audits to the entire country could yield between $4-10 Billion/year from Medicare alone.

    Recognizing the potential of the program, Congress has made the recovery audit contractor program a permanent program, and CMS has started national implementation for Medicare Part A & B.  In yet another move that demonstrates the value of post-payment recovery audits as a credible way to reduce health care costs, the Senate Finance committee’s health care reform bill proposes to extend the recovery audit contractor program to Medicare Part C and D and Medicaid.

    Indeed, the extension of the RAC program to Medicare part C and D as well as to Medicaid has the potential to double recoveries to a range of $10-20 billion/year.

    OMB Budget Director Peter Orszag says evidence suggests that each dollar spent making sure medical providers “are receiving only what they are supposed to be receiving saves $1.60 in erroneous payments.” All told, $50 billion in ten years in reduced errors and improper payments both on the benefit side and revenue side.

    So, even if we take the low end of the range, post-payment recovery audits could easily yield over $100 Billion or 12.5% of the total added cost of the health care reform bill over 10 years

    –Indy Gill, Vice President – Health Care Audit Services, PRG-Schultz USA, Inc.

    .

    References:

    http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&-_box_head_nbr=GCT-T1-R&-ds_name=PEP_2008_EST&-_lang=en&-format=US-40S&-_sse=on

Share

Previous post:

Next post: