<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Health Crisis &#187; employer-based</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ushealthcrisis.com/tag/employer-based/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ushealthcrisis.com</link>
	<description>Survival Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employer Sponsored Health Care: Some New Directions</title>
		<link>http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/06/employer-sponsored-health-care-some-new-directions/</link>
		<comments>http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/06/employer-sponsored-health-care-some-new-directions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer-based]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ushealthcrisis.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes laughter is good for emphasizing something&#8217;s importance, and sometimes only shock therapy will work. A funny new direction from our friend Herman Dreier: TOP TEN INDICATORS THAT YOUR EMPLOYER HAS CHANGED TO A CHEAPER HEALTH CARE PLAN: (10) Your annual breast exam is done at Hooters. (9) Directions to your doctor&#8217;s office include &#8220;Take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Sometimes laughter is good for emphasizing something&#8217;s importance, and sometimes only shock therapy will work.</p>
<p>A funny new direction from our friend Herman Dreier:</p>
<p>TOP TEN INDICATORS THAT YOUR EMPLOYER HAS CHANGED TO A CHEAPER HEALTH<br />
CARE PLAN:</p>
<p>  (10) Your annual breast exam is done at Hooters.</p>
<p>  (9) Directions to your doctor&#8217;s office include &#8220;Take a left when you enter the trailer park.&#8221;</p>
<p>  (8) The tongue depressors taste faintly of Fudgesicles.</p>
<p>  (7) The only proctologist in the plan is &#8220;Gus&#8221; from Roto-Rooter.</p>
<p>  (6) The only item listed under Preventive Care Coverage is &#8220;an apple a day&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>  (5) Your primary care physician is wearing the pants you gave to Goodwill last month.<br />
<span id="more-246"></span><br />
  (4) &#8220;The patient is responsible for 200% of out-of-network charges,&#8221; is not a typographical error.</p>
<p>  (3) The only expense covered 100% is &#8220;embalming.&#8221;</p>
<p>  (2) Your Prozac comes in different colors with little M&#8217;s on them.</p>
<p>  AND THE NUMBER ONE SIGN YOU&#8217;VE JOINED A VERY CHEAP HEALTH CARE PLAN:</p>
<p>  (1) You ask for Viagra and they give you a Popsicle stick and Duct Tape.</p>
<p>And one that&#8217;s not so funny, from the <a href="http://arizonahealthfutures.org/?p=267">blog of St. Luke&#8217;s Health Initiatives:</a></p>
<p>Here is part of an actual quote from a major private health insurance company for providing coverage to an Arizona small business with seven employees:</p>
<p>61 y. male and spouse 	$5,442.97/month<br />
24 y. male 	$484.29/month<br />
30 y. male/family 	$3,421.59/month<br />
32 y. female 	$1,410.75/month</p>
<p>You do the math. Total annual health coverage premium for this small business: $245,078.88!</p>
<p>Cost is the critical issue, not who pays. This borders on the criminal. </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fushealthcrisis.com%2F2009%2F06%2Femployer-sponsored-health-care-some-new-directions%2F&amp;title=Employer%20Sponsored%20Health%20Care%3A%20Some%20New%20Directions" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://ushealthcrisis.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/06/employer-sponsored-health-care-some-new-directions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer-based health insurance: a failed approach</title>
		<link>http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/01/employer-based-health-insurance-a-failed-approach/</link>
		<comments>http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/01/employer-based-health-insurance-a-failed-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Blackerby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Payers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guest contributor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ushealthcrisis.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. employers are at a competitive disadvantage because of ever-rising employee health insurance costs. Virtually every other developed country pays for health care with taxes and modest co-payments. In these countries, health care is either a citizenship right or a human right, not an employment right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="entry">
<p>The U.S. is the only country on the planet pursuing employer-based health insurance. It was started by the labor movement as a way to increase benefits without increasing taxable wages in an era when income tax schedules were much more progressive. The U.S. was the first country to develop any mechanism for widespread health insurance, but no other country followed our now-failed model of employer-based health insurance plans.</p>
<p>Today, U.S. employers are at a competitive disadvantage relative to employers in other countries because of ever-rising employee health insurance costs. Virtually every other developed country taxes its citizens and businesses to subsidize health care, with modest co-payments from patients. In these countries, health care is either a citizenship right or a human right, not an employment right.</p>
<p>One consequence is that our manufactured goodsâ€“in particularâ€“are relatively more expensive in international markets than comparable manufactured goods from other countries, just due to health insurance costs.</p>
<p>Another consequence is that U.S. residents are less-healthy than citizens in most other developing countries, and our health care costs are much higher per capita; we spend more for a lower level of health overall. In the U.S., insurance companies focus on how to off-load sick people to improve financial performance. Single-payor systems canâ€™t off-load patients, so they soon figure out that health care prevention is cheaper than health care, and they invest significantly in preventative health care.</p>
<p>Employer-based health care made sense only when no other country was investing in widespread health insurance and governments were reluctant to recognize health care rights. Today, neither of these conditions exist, but we remain stuck with this failed system.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ushealthcrisis.com/2009/01/employer-based-health-insurance-a-failed-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

